LOLER & PUWER Inspection Software That Passes Audits

By Riley Quinn on August 17, 2026

loler-puwer-inspection-software

A missed LOLER thorough examination is not a paperwork problem — it is a legal-defence problem. The moment a 6-monthly interval on a MEWP or a 12-monthly on a forklift lapses, equipment is out of compliance regardless of condition, and any incident that follows lands in front of an HSE inspector without the document that would have justified use. Oxmaint schedules every LOLER exam, PUWER inspection and pressure-system check automatically, captures competent-person reports with photo evidence, and warns duty holders 30 days before any certificate lapses. Book a demo to see zero-missed-inspection compliance in action.

HSE reality check: Inability to produce examination reports is one of the most common triggers for formal enforcement. Penalties include unlimited fines, prohibition notices, and up to 2 years imprisonment for the most serious breaches.

The Two Intervals That Decide Whether You're Compliant

Regulation 9 of LOLER draws a hard line between equipment that lifts loads and equipment that lifts people. Get the interval wrong on either side and every inspection that follows is scheduled against the wrong clock. The most common finding in HSE improvement notices is not defective equipment — it is a 12-month interval applied to accessories that should sit on a 6-month cycle. Slings, chains, and shackles are lifting equipment in their own right, with their own examination reports, regardless of how infrequently they are used.

Statutory Examination Intervals at a Glance
Default intervals under LOLER Regulation 9 — unless a written scheme drawn up by a competent person specifies otherwise
Every 6 Months
Equipment used to lift people OR any lifting accessory
  • MEWPs and cherry pickers
  • Passenger lifts & goods-passenger lifts
  • Patient hoists & stairlifts
  • Man-riding baskets on cranes / forklifts
  • Slings, chains, shackles, eyebolts
  • Lifting beams & spreader bars
Every 12 Months
Lifting equipment not used to lift people
  • Overhead & gantry cranes
  • Mobile & tower cranes (load-only use)
  • Forklift trucks (load-only)
  • Vehicle tail-lifts (goods only)
  • Winches, jib cranes, hoists
  • Runway beams & monorails

How Missed Inspections Actually Happen

No duty holder plans to miss an examination. Missed inspections are the byproduct of spreadsheets that get out of date, engineer surveyor reports filed in email folders, and asset registers that never quite match what is on the shop floor. The failure pattern is almost always the same across four points where compliance quietly breaks down.

The Four Breakdown Points in Manual LOLER/PUWER Compliance
01
Asset register drift
New slings arrive at site, get put into service, and never make it onto the register. When the HSE asks for a full inventory, the paper list doesn't match the rigging loft.
02
Interval confusion
Accessories put on the same 12-month cycle as the crane they hang from. Every sling examined half as often as the law requires — often for years before anyone notices.
03
Report filed, defect forgotten
Competent person flags a Category A defect. Report sits in an inbox. Equipment continues in service. This is one of the most heavily-enforced failures in the HSE's records.
04
Certificate lapse
The 30-day warning that would have triggered a booking never fires because nobody owns the reminder. Equipment is used past its examination date — the single most common LOLER breach.

Every one of those failure points is a scheduling and evidence problem, not an engineering one. That is exactly why a CMMS purpose-built for statutory inspections closes the gap. Sign up free to see how a live asset register stops the drift at point one.

What Oxmaint Automates — Mapped to the Regulation

A LOLER/PUWER system is only useful if it maps cleanly to the actual regulatory obligations a duty holder carries. Below is what Oxmaint does at each stage of the compliance cycle, and which regulation it satisfies. This is the view an HSE inspector effectively works through when they arrive on site and ask for records.

Regulation What the law requires How Oxmaint handles it
LOLER Reg 9(3)
Thorough examination at 6 or 12 months
Every asset examined by a competent person at the statutory interval, or per written scheme. Interval set per asset. Work orders auto-generated. 30-day certificate-lapse warnings.
LOLER Reg 9(4)
Exceptional-circumstances exam
Re-examination after any event liable to jeopardise safety (impact, modification, critical repair). One-tap "trigger event" work order from a mobile — links back to the parent asset history.
LOLER Reg 10
Defect notification
Duty holder must remove equipment from service until any Cat A defect is rectified. Cat A flag on a report auto-triggers a lock-out status and blocks further scheduling.
LOLER Reg 11 & Schedule 1
Written report retention
Reports kept until next report or minimum 2 years, and available to inspectors on request. Every report stored digitally against the asset, exportable as an audit pack in one click.
PUWER Reg 6
Inspection of work equipment
Inspection at intervals suitable for the risk, with a record kept. Custom PUWER checklists per asset class, photo evidence attached to each check.
PSSR
Pressure-system exam
Written scheme of examination for pressure systems, followed to date. Pressure vessels scheduled on the same platform — one compliance calendar across regimes.
See Your Next 12 Months of Inspections in One View
Oxmaint builds a live compliance calendar from your asset register — every LOLER, PUWER and PSSR interval, every certificate expiry, every competent-person report. Walk through a real deployment in 30 minutes.

The Evidence Layer: What a Digital Certificate Actually Looks Like

Under Schedule 1, a thorough examination report has to contain specific fields — date of examination, identification of equipment, defects found, deadline for the next inspection, and the signature of the competent person. On paper this becomes a filing problem the moment a site has more than a few dozen assets. In Oxmaint the same information becomes a queryable record that an HSE inspector can be walked through in minutes, not days.

Thorough Examination Report
LOLER Reg 9 · Schedule 1
Asset IDMEWP-04 (Genie Z-45)
Examination date14 Nov 2026
Interval6-monthly (lifts persons)
Competent personJ. Reid, IRATA L3
Next exam due14 May 2027
Photos attached7
Pass — no defects
1
Photo evidence on every check. Engineer surveyors capture images inline against each Schedule 1 field — no separate photo album to reconcile later.
2
Competent-person e-signature. Sign-off is captured on the mobile at the point of examination, not typed up back at the office.
3
Next-due date written back automatically. The interval clock resets on sign-off — no manual diary update needed.
4
Audit pack export. Every report for a given asset — or the whole site — downloadable as a single PDF pack for an HSE visit.

The point of the evidence layer is not neatness. It is that when the HSE arrives, the difference between a five-minute conversation and a formal improvement notice is whether the reports exist and can be produced. Book a demo to walk through a real audit-pack export against your own asset types.

Expert Review — What Actually Fails an HSE Audit

Duty holders don't get prosecuted because their engineers can't spot a cracked sling. They get prosecuted because they couldn't produce the report, because a Category A defect was "monitored" while the equipment stayed in service, or because the accessory register never made it off a spreadsheet from three years ago.
Missing reports
Cited by the HSE as one of the most common triggers of formal enforcement action against duty holders.
Uncontrolled Cat A defects
Reg 10 requires removal from service. Continuing to run flagged equipment is a direct route to prohibition notice and prosecution.
Wrong interval on accessories
Slings on a 12-month cycle instead of 6 — the single most common finding in lifting-related improvement notices.
"Desk examinations"
Reports produced without site attendance. Independence and physical inspection are non-negotiable under the ACOP.

Getting Compliant Without Rebuilding Your Asset Register

The friction most duty holders assume they'll hit — rebuilding an asset register from scratch — isn't the reality of how Oxmaint gets deployed. Existing spreadsheets, engineer surveyor CSVs, and legacy CMMS exports import directly, and the platform reconciles duplicates against equipment serial numbers. Intervals are set per asset class as a default and overridden where a written examination scheme applies. Within the first cycle every asset carries a live next-due date, a compliance history, and a photo-evidence trail. Sign up free and import your current register to see what the compliance calendar looks like for your specific mix of lifting equipment and work equipment.

Who Uses Oxmaint for LOLER and PUWER Compliance

The platform is built for the specific mix of roles that carry duty-holder obligations day-to-day: facilities managers holding LOLER duty across passenger lifts and MEWPs, maintenance heads running mixed lifting and work-equipment fleets in manufacturing, HSE managers responsible for producing audit packs on demand, and third-party inspection companies delivering competent-person reports at scale. Each of those roles sees a different view of the same underlying compliance calendar, permissions scoped to what they actually need to act on. Sign up free and configure roles for your compliance team in the first setup session.

Zero Missed Inspections. Every Site. Every Certificate.
Move LOLER, PUWER and PSSR compliance off spreadsheets and email folders. Oxmaint schedules the exam, captures the report, stores the evidence, and warns you 30 days before anything lapses.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between a LOLER thorough examination and a PUWER inspection?
A LOLER thorough examination is a statutory examination under Regulation 9 by a competent, sufficiently independent person, producing a written Schedule 1 report at 6- or 12-monthly intervals. A PUWER inspection under Regulation 6 is broader — it applies to work equipment generally, its frequency is risk-based rather than fixed in the regulations, and it can be performed by suitably trained in-house staff. The two regimes often apply to the same asset (a forklift, for example) and Oxmaint schedules both against the same equipment record.
Do I really need to examine slings and shackles every 6 months even if we hardly use them?
Yes. Lifting accessories fall under the 6-month default in Regulation 9(3) regardless of usage frequency, unless a written examination scheme drawn up by a competent person justifies a different interval on a risk basis. Applying a 12-month interval to accessories by default is one of the most commonly cited failures in HSE lifting-related improvement notices.
Can our in-house engineer sign off LOLER thorough examinations?
Only if they meet the "competent person" test in the ACOP — practical and theoretical knowledge sufficient to detect defects and judge their significance — and they are sufficiently independent from the day-to-day maintenance of the equipment. In practice, an engineer who routinely services a machine is not considered independent enough to also examine it under LOLER, which is why most duty holders use an external engineer surveyor. Oxmaint records the competent person against each report either way.
What happens if a thorough examination flags a Category A defect?
Under LOLER Regulation 10 the duty holder must remove the equipment from service until the defect is rectified, and the competent person must notify the enforcing authority. Continuing to use equipment with an outstanding Category A defect is one of the enforcement patterns the HSE cites most often. In Oxmaint, a Category A flag on a report automatically applies a lock-out status to the asset and blocks any further work-order scheduling until sign-off.
How does Oxmaint handle multi-site compliance?
Every asset is tagged to its site, and the compliance calendar rolls up either at site level for a facilities manager or at group level for a duty holder with obligations across multiple locations. Certificate-expiry warnings, overdue examinations, and outstanding Category A defects are visible in one dashboard, with the option to export an audit pack per site for HSE visits or insurance reviews.

Share This Story, Choose Your Platform!